This report provides a critical analysis of how cryptocurrency investigations are being used as a tool for undue pressure and political persecution. The research reveals mechanisms where on-chain analytics serve as a pretext for arbitrary asset freezes and blackmail without proper judicial oversight. The author details the problem of “analytical arbitrariness,” where the findings of private companies are accepted by state agencies as indisputable facts, depriving market participants of their right to an effective defense. Special emphasis is placed on the risks of using digital footprints to fabricate cases and the necessity of creating independent audit mechanisms for crypto-investigations to prevent systemic abuses in the digital environment.
Citation Rules
- Mandatory source attribution. When using ARGA Observatory materials, the full name must be cited.
- Date and version indication. For analytical reports, the year of publication is mandatory.
- Link to the original. Electronic materials must be accompanied by an active link to the official website.
- Context preservation. Citations must not be shortened or altered in a way that distorts the original meaning.
- Note on adaptation. If the text is abridged or translated, state: "adapted from ARGA Observatory report".
- No commercial use without written permission from the organization.
- Data accuracy preservation. Charts and tables must be reproduced without changes.