This report provides an in-depth analysis of the legal and procedural conflicts arising during international investigations of cryptocurrency crimes. The research focuses on the problem of the “jurisdictional vacuum” and simultaneous claims by multiple states to the right to adjudicate digital assets that lack physical borders. The author details the critical shortcomings of existing Mutual Legal Assistance Treaties (MLAT), which fail to match the speed of blockchain transactions, and analyzes the risks of “double jeopardy” for market participants. Special emphasis is placed on decentralized protocols as zones of permanent legal conflict and the necessity of creating supranational standards for verifying evidence obtained from distributed ledgers to prevent institutional chaos in global justice.
Citation Rules
- Mandatory source attribution. When using ARGA Observatory materials, the full name must be cited.
- Date and version indication. For analytical reports, the year of publication is mandatory.
- Link to the original. Electronic materials must be accompanied by an active link to the official website.
- Context preservation. Citations must not be shortened or altered in a way that distorts the original meaning.
- Note on adaptation. If the text is abridged or translated, state: "adapted from ARGA Observatory report".
- No commercial use without written permission from the organization.
- Data accuracy preservation. Charts and tables must be reproduced without changes.