This report provides a critical analysis of the legal and institutional models for seizing digital assets in international law enforcement practice. The research exposes a significant gap between the public narrative of “successful fund recovery” and the actual statistics of restitution for victims. The author details the substitution of concepts where asset confiscation for state revenue dominates over the tasks of restoring the rights of crime victims. Special emphasis is placed on the role of private platforms as de facto seizure operators, the political and economic incentives of state agencies, and the problem of interstate competition for confiscated funds. The report reveals systemic barriers that turn crypto-assets into a convenient object for fiscal replenishment, often excluding actual damage compensation for those affected.
Citation Rules
- Mandatory source attribution. When using ARGA Observatory materials, the full name must be cited.
- Date and version indication. For analytical reports, the year of publication is mandatory.
- Link to the original. Electronic materials must be accompanied by an active link to the official website.
- Context preservation. Citations must not be shortened or altered in a way that distorts the original meaning.
- Note on adaptation. If the text is abridged or translated, state: "adapted from ARGA Observatory report".
- No commercial use without written permission from the organization.
- Data accuracy preservation. Charts and tables must be reproduced without changes.