Automated AML Systems, False Positives, and the Risk of Institutional Disproportion: A Structural Assessment for the U.S. Financial System

Published
February 19, 2026
Author
Khrabrykh S. A.
Original language
English

This report examines the evolution of Anti-Money Laundering (AML) systems in the United States, tracing the transition from manual controls to algorithmic methods and the resulting systemic risks. It focuses on the issue of false positives, which leads to “defensive compliance,” information overload for regulators, and a shift in institutional proportionality within the financial architecture

Full text of the document
ARGA Observatory

Citation Rules

  1. Mandatory source attributionWhen using ARGA Observatory materials, the full name must be cited.
  2. Date and version indicationFor analytical reports, the year of publication is mandatory.
  3. Link to the originalElectronic materials must be accompanied by an active link to the official website.
  4. Context preservationCitations must not be shortened or altered in a way that distorts the original meaning.
  5. Note on adaptationIf the text is abridged or translated, state: "adapted from ARGA Observatory report".
  6. No commercial use without written permission from the organization
  7. Data accuracy preservationCharts and tables must be reproduced without changes.
Confidential enquiry

Ask the ARGA experts

Four short steps. We reply within one business day.

Step 1 of 4
What situation are you facing?
What stage is the case at?
Describe the situation
You can skip this field.
How should we reach you?
Your enquiry goes straight to ARGA experts. We do not publish it or pass it to third parties.
Official registration
ARGA in international registries
UNGM ID
1232417
ARGA is registered in the United Nations procurement system.
View registration
UN Global Compact
213173
Participant of the UN Global Compact.
ADB GMS Number
049963
Asian Development Bank — registered participant.
Scroll to Top